|
Spielerei Magazine
Issue No. 42, January-March 1999
Helmut Wresnik
Germany
It can be of great advantage if one, like me this year,
is not able to attend the Spiel in Essen from its beginning:
once you get there, everyone you meet tells you about
their personal favorites that you definitely have to
check out. This year they were Keydom (which I had already
gotten before the show, and I was glad I did because
the 200 copies Richard Breese had brought along were
already gone by Thursday night) and Bosworth,
which was described to me as "Chess game with cards".
Well, I am not a very big fan of chess; probably because
my abilities don't quite measure up to my desire to
play the game well - and for that reason I am also rather
wary about chess variants. However, since the booth
of "Out of the Box", the game's publisher, was situated
right next to the German Game Archive, where I just
like in previous years had set up my camp, I went there
right away. At first I was watching for a while and
was surprised that I indeed did not see any chess pieces
or a chessboard. Rather, there was a 4 x 4 field game
board on which the cards were laid out, which - depending
on the chess piece they displayed - moved and captured
accordingly. Who would be surprised that up to four
players can participate in this hustle and bustle.
Each player has on set of cards, which represent the
16 pieces that are needed for a game of chess. One picks
out four pawns and sets them on one's baseline. Each
player shuffles his remaining 12 cards and draws four
of them for the hand; they represent the reserve. The
player whose turn it is moves one of his cards according
to the chess rules, captures the opponent card if possible
and fills any gaps in the baseline with cards form his
hand. The replenishing of the hand is the end of the
turn.
As already mentioned, the pieces move like they would
in chess. Only the pawns became a little more mobile
because they cannot only move forward but also one field
vertically or horizontally; as in the original, one
can beat diagonally, here however, in all four possible
directions. Is the king of one player captured, his
figures (i.e. his cards) are removed and the king's
murderer receives the other queen. This is by the way
the only possibility to gain more pieces, since there
is no pawn promotion when he reaches the opponent's
baseline. That does not matter, though, since the pawn
already gained a lot of power through the greater freedom
of movement and the extended capture possibilities.
As a countermove, the figures with the long moves -
queen, rook, and bishop - got considerably weaker. For
one, because the game board was reduced to a quarter
of its size and they therefore cannot exhibit their
long-distance effects, and also because they (especially
because of the pawns' ability to capture in each diagonal
direction) are very quickly to be without a secure space
and get captured. Therefore a new valuation of the strengths
and weaknesses of the figures takes place, and the traditional
tactics and strategies of chess can hardly be applied
to Bosworth.
It is almost regrettable that Bosworth
has its roots in chess, since that might be a reason
for many not to take a closer look at the game. However,
the atmosphere, where a lot of hard thinking goes on
that's so typical for chess hardly ever occurs, especially
not when more than two players are participating - and
it's exactly those games that are the most fun. A lot
of brooding is not worth it because one never knows
what cards the opponents will put down next. One thing
is quite certain, though: The king will appear last.
Therefore, one should also try to keep the spaces of
one's own baseline occupied, because as long as the
king is not in the game one cannot lose.
If Bosworth were to be
improved, the design of the game materials could use
a little work. First, there is the 4x4 field game board
which is nevertheless not square (since the size of
the spaces corresponds to the size of the cards which
are rectangular and not squares). This often causes
problems with threats across the diagonal which are
easily overlooked. And while one is at it, it might
be worthwhile considering whether it wouldn't be better
to use a little bit thicker cardboard tiles instead
of the playing cards, since they would be a lot easier
to handle.
But even without these improvements Bosworth
is a successful game, which as hinted at by the
publishing company's name "Out of the Box" can be played
without a lot of preparations, as long as one is familiar
with the moves of chess pieces - and almost everybody
is. And when you are getting a little bored with Bosworth
go and visit "Out of the Box's" homepage (http://www.otb-games.com),
where author Mark Osterhaus recently started to offer
several variations.
Back to Bosworth
Reviews page
|